Re: understanding ages in 1841 census
If he was 39, he “should” have been shown as 35. But application was very inconsistent.toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
If it shows 39, then it is highly probable that in the Spring of 1841 he claimed to be 39, and so born in the last 8 months of 1801 or the first 4 of 1802.
On Jun 1, 2020, at 4:11 PM, JANET MORGAN via groups.io <Jmorgan441@...> wrote: